Possibility Books

Possibility Books (also known in prior iterations as Visual Notebooks and ThinkBooks) are a series of brief, ten-minute daily prompts, which a class responds to through the process of individual mark-making, allowing for nuanced embodied reflection. Possibility Books is a signature pedagogy at Colorado College that has been used in over 125 courses across disciplines. When Possibility Books are integrated into a course, the interactions foster a collaborative learning environment in which co-creation of knowledge can occur. Implementation of Possibility Books encourages students to establish more meaningful connections with the content, thereby enhancing their learning. Over 80% of students surveyed said that Possibility Books should be used in other courses.

How They Work

Possibility Books are a pedagogical method where the creative and imaginative aspects of inquiry take precedence using mark-making, a free-flowing, non-representational, and open-ended process that leads to novel ideas and insights. This kinesthetic reflection enhances Creativity Mindsets (stay curious, remain open, risk failure, navigate ambiguity, make unexpected connections, explore possibilities), which support cognitive monitoring (e.g., self-regulation) resulting in the conscious recognition of new connections across existing knowledge. This pedagogy intentionally moves participants between familiar and unfamiliar spaces, deepening the interplay between insight and intuition. 

Our research on the use of mark-making to prioritize embodied learning shows that using Possibility Books to practice Creativity Mindsets develops Creative Critical Inquiry. The study employed a sequential, phenomenological mixed-methods approach to provide a nuanced understanding of the participants’ experience using Possibility Books. Participants were faculty (N = 59, instructed on Possibility Books) and undergraduate students (N = 494) who completed a post-experience questionnaire (Cronbach's α = .861 on scaled items). Qualitative coding revealed consistent patterns that support embodied-first pedagogical sequencing, Creativity Mindset practice, and the co-creation of knowledge. Participants consistently described insights that "surprised" them, suggesting that mark-making accessed embodied understandings which are often less explored through traditional education logic-first approaches. 

Principal component analysis revealed two distinct but positively correlated factors (r = .403, p < .001) that align with theories supporting Creative Critical Inquiry. The Cognitive Monitoring Factor (α = .882) encompasses safe spaces for thinking, visual learning enhancement, life connections, problem-solving integration, stress reduction, and community building. The Creativity Mindsets Factor (α = .709) captures uncertainty tolerance, creative self-concept, curiosity, the risk of idea sharing, and openness. Results confirm that the use of Possibility Books with mark-making creates learning environments across disciplines that honor embodied knowledge and collective thinking, which strengthens the interplay between insight and intuition.

 

Possibility Books contribute to Colorado College’s mission to develop habits of intellect and imagination that promote learning and leadership by:

  • Providing consistent, structured opportunities to process ideas and reflect on questions, encouraging more meaningful engagement with course materials, and allowing students to iterate their understanding of the content.
  • Making creativity practice part of students’ academic routine, honing their creative thinking and problem-solving skills, and strengthening creative confidence.
  • Introducing modes of learning that have been excluded from traditional, colonial-based academic inquiry and creating space that centers various identity perspectives as assets. In this way, Possibility Books also support the College’s institutional antiracism commitment.
  • Positively influencing students’ wellbeing—including increasing levels of focus and reducing anxiety—and their sense of belonging in class.

Getting Started

Faculty curious about using Possibility Books in their courses can peruse more detailed information about the pedagogy. C&I hosts Possibility Books workshops in which participants acquire practical experience with the pedagogy and learn how to adapt it to meet their specific goals. The workshops are open to anyone teaching a course at CC. Faculty deciding to use Possibility Books will receive all materials needed from C&I and can meet one-on-one with C&I staff for support on adapting prompts to their courses.

Student Experiences

"The Possibility Books supported my learning process by allowing me to center myself at the beginning of class. It was also very helpful for making unexpected connections with class content to things that I think about more, like things that I do a lot or see a lot of. It also made me feel comfortable in the class because we were all sharing our thoughts and notes/drawings with each other, so it lowered the competitive barrier that is often in these types of classes."

- Student in a 300 level Chemistry course

"[Possibility Books] gave me the space to be myself and record how I think without fear of judgement, where I came up with some ideas that surprised me and my classmates! It was amazing!" 

- Student in a 200 level General Studies course

Student Examples

Report an issue - Last updated: 07/15/2025

Supporting Research

Denton, A. (2018). The Use of a Reflective Learning Journal in an Introductory Statistics Course. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 17(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725717728676

Doyle, C. (2024). Creative Experience—Multiple Worlds, Projects, Emotions, and Endpoints: On Glaveanu & Beghetto’s Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal36(2), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2115643

Kortegast, C., McCann, K., Branch, K., Latz, A.O., Kelly, B.T., & Linder, C. (2019). Enhancing ways of knowing: The case for utilizing participant-generated visual methods. The Review of Higher Education, 42(2), 485–510. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0004

Green, K. L. (2020). Radical imagination and “otherwise possibilities” in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 33(1), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1678781

Moate, J., Hulse, B., Jahnke, H., & Owens, A. (2019). Exploring the Material Mediation of Dialogic Space—A Qualitative Analysis of Professional Learning in Initial Teacher Education based on Reflective Sketchbooks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.12.003

Qualley, D. J., & Chiseri-Strater, E. (1994). Collaboration as Reflexive Dialogue: A Knowing “Deeper Than Reason.” Journal of Advanced Composition14(1), 111–130. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20865950